Saltmarshes in eastern Nebraska: Study characterizes
some unusual wetlands
by Michael C. Gilbert, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Omaha District, and
Randy G. Stutheit, Nebraska Game and Parks
Commission
The city of Lincoln, Neb., was founded in the mid-1800s along Salt
Creek. As the name of the creek implies, the potential for commercial
salt production from saline wetlands played a key role in Lincoln's
settlement and early history. Although other sources of salt that could
be mined cheaply were found in the region, the impact of civilization on
the Salt Creek wetlands continued.
During the last century, the saline
marshes suffered extensive degradation through commercial and
residential development, road construction, and agriculture. Today,
Nebraska's eastern saline wetlands are considered to be among the most
restricted and imperiled ecosystems.
Background about the wetlands
Hydrology. Eastern Nebraska saline wetlands are regionally unique,
located in
floodplain swales and depressions within the Salt Rock watersheds in
Lancaster and southern Saunders counties. Water regimes are temporarily
and seasonally flooded on saline mineral soils. Water sources are a
combination of discharge from the Dakota sandstone formation aquifer,
precipitation, and overbank flooding. Salts are concentrated in the
soil during dry periods.
Flora. Vegetation in
these wetlands is characterized by halophytes including spearscale (Atriplex
subspicata), inland saltgrass (Distichlis spicata var. stricta),
saltwort (Salicornia rubra)
(Fig. 1 (32K)), prairie bulrush
(Scirpus maritimus var. paludosus), sea blite
(Suaeda depressa), and narrow-leaved cattail (Typha
angustifolia). Four plant species considered rare in Nebraska are
saltmarsh aster (Aster subulatus var. ligulatus), seaside
heliotrope (Heliotropium curassavicum), saltwort, and Texas
dropseed (Sporobolus texanus) can be found in the marshes along
Salt Creek.
Fauna. The saline wetlands provide
habitat for a variety of wildlife species and serve as stopover for
migratory birds, particularly for shorebirds during spring, when
mudflats provide abundant invertebrate foods. These wetlands also are
the sole habitat for an endemic tiger beetle, Cicindela nevadica var.
lincolniana (Fig. 2 (23K)).
Public awareness spawns characterization study
Since 1988, wetland inventory and public outreach efforts in
Nebraska have contributed to an increased awareness of eastern
Nebraska's saline wetlands and their importance. This awareness, and
acknowledgement that a balanced, resource-based approach is needed for
wetland survival, has stimulated public interest in preservation,
resource-sensitive urban planning, cooperative wetland enhancement
efforts, and mitigation banking. To ensure that information continues
to contribute to the understanding of saline wetlands and to create
opportunities for pro-active wetland initiatives, an updated inventory
was compiled and technical value assessments of existing saline wetlands
were conducted. An interagency team then designed objectives for a
study to provide:
- the best information available about the location of
saline wetlands in Lancaster and southern Saunders counties and
- a qualitative assessment of individual saline wetlands, their relative
potential to maintain historic functions, and their value resulting from
these functions.
The team of individuals from the Nebraska Game and
Parks Commission, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nebraska Department of
Environmental Quality, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency identified study boundaries, established
categorization criteria, and conducted individual site assessments.
Gathering mapping and site information
Distribution of saline hydric soils within the respective counties
(Table 1) was used to establish study area
boundaries. These data, in
conjunction with existing Nebraska Game and Parks Commission wetland
survey information, helped define the saline wetlands of interest
(
Fig. 3 (63K)). The state wetland survey effort included both mapping
products and information on critical species and plant community
occurrences.
The study team was then able to prioritize site
assessments for integration towards updated wetlands mapping. Digital
National Wetlands Inventory data were the crucial link between field
analyses and updating saline wetland inventory information. The
combination of quality information prior to initiation of the resource
categorization study, availability of new digital wetlands data, and
field assessments focusing on critical habitat features provided the
necessary components for study goals.
Evaluation
criteria results in categories
Comparative site evaluations
were based on the occurrence of the Salt Creek tiger beetle, presence of
rare or restricted halophytes, historical significance, occurrence of
halophytic associations, degree of degradation, degree of pollution,
proximity to municipal or industrial solid waste disposal sites, and
restoration potential. Scientists then defined four standardized wetland
categories:
Category I: Site currently provides saline
wetland functions of high value or has the potential to provide high
values following restoration or enhancement measures. The site meets
one or more of the following criteria:
- Salt Creek tiger beetle present,
- the presence of one or more rare or restricted halophytes
- identified as having historical significance by the Nebraska State
Historical Society,
- contains at least one saline wetland plant association as part of
the site's flora and is not highly degraded or has potential to maintain
or improve saline wetland characteristics through enhancement or
restoration,
- contains no saline wetland plant associations but high potential
exists for restoring the historic salt source.
Category
II: Given current land use and degree of degradation, site
currently provides limited saline wetland functions and low values.
Restoration potential is low. The site meets one or more of the
following criteria:
- currently contaminated by hazardous or toxic waste or is/has been
used for municipal or industrial solid waste disposal; has limited
potential for providing high functions and values through restoration,
- contains at least one saline wetland plant association as part of
the site's flora and is highly degraded; has limited potential for the
long-term maintenance or improvement of saline vegetative
characteristics through enhancement or restoration,
- contains no saline wetland plant associations and provides low
functions and values due to degradation; has low potential for
restoration of the historic salt source.
Category
III: Site is functioning as a freshwater wetland having
freshwater plant communities on a saline soil. Currently provides
freshwater wetland values and no feasible restoration measures exist to
reestablish the historic salt source and saline plant associations.
Category IV: Site is functioning as a freshwater wetland
having freshwater plant communities on a non-saline hydric soil. Areas
with insufficient data for categorization or inaccessible to the
interagency work team were "NC" meaning "not categorized."
Categorization process described
The interagency work team
identified some sites that had sufficient existing information on file
for categorization without a field visit. All other sites were visited
by team representatives prior to categorization.
Site assessments
were conducted during the growing season in 1992 and 1993. Standardized
field assessment forms were used. In addition, a qualitative judgment
by the interagency work team about the site's degree of disturbance or
restorability was noted. Consensus among the interagency work team was
required in the final determination of a category designation.
Results
of category designations were summarized in a database. These data were
then imported as a relational table for geographic information
system-based mapping. Commercially available software for digital data
processing and analyses was used.
Results
Team members identified 276 wetlands
with saline characteristics. More than 70 percent of these sites had
sufficient data, either through documentation from the state survey or
field evaluations, to allow category designations. In total, 5,644.1
acres of wetlands and deepwater habitats were identified within the
study area.
Category I wetlands were the largest both in terms of
number of sites and acreage. None of the sites were of historical
significance. Category I wetlands comprised approximately 57 percent of
the total wetlands and deepwater habitats within the study area.
Category II wetlands, with 7 percent representation, were the least
frequent in terms of total acreage. Category III wetlands, freshwater
vegetational communities on saline soils, ranked second in terms of
acreage with 11 percent of the total wetlands and deepwater habitats.
Category IV wetlands account for 10 percent of the total wetland acreage
and deepwater habitats within the study area. No site data for Category
IV wetlands were recorded, as these freshwater vegetational communities
on non-saline soils were not a focus of the study. This category did,
however, represent an important component of wetlands within the study
area.
Seventy-nine sites were not categorized. All were located
on saline soils. The status, quality, and halophytic character of these
wetlands are presently unknown. Remaining non-saline wetlands and
deepwater habitats within the study area are associated with rivers and
lakes. Federal, state, and local agencies are currently using the study
results in zoning applications, initiation of private mitigation banks,
wetland acquisition, and day-to-day Section 404 permit reviews. The
results of this study are available in computer mapping/database format.
These data can be used in future applications for trend analysis, land
use planning, and as a mechanism for prioritization of restoration
sites. To maximize utility in these applications, digital data for land
use classes, watershed units, and soils could be incorporated into
future geographic information system analyses.
Additional
information about the Nebraska eastern saline wetlands categorization
project may be obtained by contacting Mike Gilbert at (402) 221-3057 or
Randy Stutheit at (402) 471-5584.
back to contents